At some point in your life, you or a loved one is likely to join the long wait list for an organ transplant, along with the other 1600 Canadians added annually. Imagine having to put your life in the hands of the people around you, hoping a transplant is possible before it's too late. Unfortunately for some, this day will never come. In 2016, 260 Canadians died waiting for transplants.
According to the Canadian Transplant Society, over 90% of Canadians support organ donation, yet under 20% have taken steps to donate, let alone register. So what is holding everyone up? The procrastination of our society has lead to hundreds of otherwise unnecessary deaths, which is why after death, organ donation should be required of all citizens.
There isn't much to back up arguments against organ donation. In situations where someone might be undergoing life-threatening surgery, using their organs isn't considered until all attempts to save the life have been exhausted and the patient is officially declared deceased. Additionally, age is not relevant in organ donation, and many illnesses, including cancer, would not automatically rule out donation. More misconceptions can be found on this Canadian University Health Network page, where they debunk a variety of myths concerning organ donation.
With Canada being one of the most culturally diverse places in the world, there are a plethora of world views and religions. While some religions have a more positive opinion of organ donation than others, most popular religions have spoken out in support of it. A study published in the medical journal "Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation", explores in great deal popular religions and their view on organ donation. The handful of religions that oppose tampering with the deceased often have overlying altruistic missions, and multiple religious figureheads have stated the latter is overriding. The journal states:
"Life initiative to increase organ donation in the UK is endorsed and supported by Anglican and Catholic bishops, the Muslim Council, the Sikh Network, a chief rabbi, and others"
In Singapore, all able-minded adult citizens are automatically presumed to be organ donors, unless against it in which case the individual can asked to be removed. In 1987, the Human Organ Transplant Act (HOTA) in Singapore began to combat the drastically low number of organ donors; The annual average of donations was only 3 between the years 1970 and 1976. According to this report, the number of donations increased dramatically and became more consistent. Even with that there is still an average annual wait list of 200 people. A similar Act would save hundreds of lives if implemented in Canada. With the option of opting out instead of having to sign up, people will still have the freedom to make their own decision.
Register here to become a donor today.
Photo by Province of British Columbia
Search Engine Optimization:
While using Google Trends, "Organ Donation" was frequently more popular that "Donating Organs". The word "required" instead of "mandatory" was used quite a bit more, 88 to 14 in most recent statistics, as well as "die" being more popular than "death"

I totally agree. At birth if we are registered as organ donors it would really help the waitlists and save lives. It's a good idea, and an important one, that you mentioned it is mandatory but if people are uncomfortable with it they can be removed from the organ donor lists if they wish.
ReplyDeleteAs long as the deceased person and their immediate family is okay with organ donation, I'm fine with it. As long as the state does not force organ donations then I see no problem.
ReplyDeletefreedoms. But your recommendation that we just assume everyone is an organ donor while giving them the right to opt out completely solved that for me! If that were the case, I think people’s laziness would work in our favour. Having said that, I’ve got a couple of questions: 1) Did you mean to say that me or my loved ones will “likely” be on the wait list for an organ transplant? “Likely” means probably, and I would assume the overwhelming majority of people don’t go on the list. And 2) The only hurdle I think is left is the matter of cost—could you find any estimates on how much it would cost to constantly be removing people’s organs?
ReplyDeleteAlthough I agree that there is not reason 100% of the population should be required to donate their organs upon death, this problem also deals with the greater ethical issue of the government and other people taking claims over parts of your body when you pass away without your consent. My human rights dictate that no other person has a claim over any part of my body and if I chose to die and keep my body intact, the government should have no say in that.(coming from a registered organ donor)
ReplyDeleteShe said that there would be an option to opt out so that you technically still have the right to your organs.
DeleteI agree with the idea to assume that everyone is an organ donor but still giving them the option to opt out if they would like to. I think this could save many lives, as well as, eliminate the stress off of the patient and their families by wondering if they will ever find a donor or not.
ReplyDeleteI agree because once you die your body is going have nothing left it. It's either going to be buried or burned. I don't see anything wrong with donating your organs that can save some lives.
ReplyDeleteI feel like there could be a better way to come around this. I feel like when born everybody should be registered as an organ donor and after the person reaches 18 they can opt out of it. However I feel like forcing someone is not okay.
ReplyDeleteI very much agree with your point that organ donation should be compulsion when you die, It is like you when you don't need your valuable things you just go and bury them in ground instead if giving them to somebody who could use them. But on the other hand we can argue that its my own thing and I can do anything thing with that thing I could go bury them but nobody should forcefully take them from me.
ReplyDeleteDonation is something that is not required, if one wants to make a donation they should be happy with doing so but if you say one has to give their organs once dead, and they don't want to do it is not donation. However, i agree with the rest of your argument that once a person is dead his/her organs should be taken out to help someone in need. But not in the name of donation, because donation is more of a gift which is not required at all.
ReplyDelete